Q8 - How would you assess your digital repository in terms of technical, structural and organizational quality, compared to other libraries of a similar size?
Q8 - How would you assess your digital repository in terms of technical, structural and organizational quality, compared to other libraries of a similar size?
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
Valid |
Better (1) |
33 |
10.0% |
34.7% |
34.7% |
Comparable to others (2) |
52 |
15.8% |
54.7% |
89.5% |
Worse (3) |
10 |
3.0% |
10.5% |
100.0% |
Total |
95 |
28.8% |
100.0% |
Mean=1.76 |
Missing |
Not applicable |
224 |
67.9% |
|
|
Don't know |
11 |
3.3% |
|
|
Total |
235 |
71.2% |
|
|
Total |
330 |
100.0% |
|
|
Q8 - How would you assess your digital repository in terms of technical, structural and organizational quality, compared to other libraries of a similar size? * Region
|
Central Europe w/o Germany |
Scandinavian countries |
New EU member states |
Mediterranean countries |
Germany |
UK and Ireland |
Total |
Better (1) |
26.1% |
44.4% |
50.0% |
20.0% |
34.5% |
40.0% |
34.7% |
6 |
4 |
7 |
2 |
10 |
4 |
33 |
Comparable to others (2) |
52.2% |
55.6% |
42.9% |
80.0% |
58.6% |
40.0% |
54.7% |
12 |
5 |
6 |
8 |
17 |
4 |
52 |
Worse (3) |
21.7% |
.0% |
7.1% |
.0% |
6.9% |
20.0% |
10.5% |
5 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
10 |
Total (Mean) |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
N=23 |
N=9 |
N=14 |
N=10 |
N=29 |
N=10 |
N=95 |
(1.96) |
(1.56) |
(1.57) |
(1.80) |
(1.72) |
(1.80) |
(1.76) |
Kruskal Wallis Test
|
Test Statistics |
Chi-Square |
4.294 |
df |
5 |
Asymp. Sig. |
.508 |
Q8 - How would you assess your digital repository in terms of technical, structural and organizational quality, compared to other libraries of a similar size? * Type of library
|
GRL |
NL |
UL |
Total |
Better (1) |
66.7% |
58.3% |
28.6% |
34.7% |
4 |
7 |
22 |
33 |
Comparable to others (2) |
33.3% |
33.3% |
59.7% |
54.7% |
2 |
4 |
46 |
52 |
Worse (3) |
.0% |
8.3% |
11.7% |
10.5% |
0 |
1 |
9 |
10 |
Total (Mean) |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
N=6 |
N=12 |
N=77 |
N=95 |
(1.33) |
(1.50) |
(1.83) |
(1.76) |
Kruskal Wallis Test
|
Test Statistics |
Chi-Square |
6.239 |
df |
2 |
Asymp. Sig. |
.044 |
Q8 - How would you assess your digital repository in terms of technical, structural and organizational quality, compared to other libraries of a similar size? * Foundation of library
|
Before 1960 |
1960 to present |
Total |
Better (1) |
34.8% |
38.5% |
35.9% |
23 |
10 |
33 |
Comparable to others (2) |
53.0% |
53.8% |
53.3% |
35 |
14 |
49 |
Worse (3) |
12.1% |
7.7% |
10.9% |
8 |
2 |
10 |
Total (Mean) |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
N=66 |
N=26 |
N=92 |
(1.77) |
(1.69) |
(1.75) |
Mann-Whitney U Test
|
Test Statistics |
Mann-Whitney U |
806.000 |
Wilcoxon W |
1157.000 |
Z |
-.504 |
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) |
.615 |
Q8 - How would you assess your digital repository in terms of technical, structural and organizational quality, compared to other libraries of a similar size? * Number of bound volumes
|
Less than 350000 |
350000 to 700000 |
700001 to 1800000 |
More than 1800000 |
Total |
Better (1) |
36.4% |
33.3% |
33.3% |
36.6% |
35.1% |
4 |
5 |
9 |
15 |
33 |
Comparable to others (2) |
54.5% |
60.0% |
59.3% |
48.8% |
54.3% |
6 |
9 |
16 |
20 |
51 |
Worse (3) |
9.1% |
6.7% |
7.4% |
14.6% |
10.6% |
1 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
10 |
Total (Mean) |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
N=11 |
N=15 |
N=27 |
N=41 |
N=94 |
(1.73) |
(1.73) |
(1.74) |
(1.78) |
(1.76) |
Kruskal Wallis Test
|
Test Statistics |
Chi-Square |
.051 |
df |
3 |
Asymp. Sig. |
.997 |
Q8 - How would you assess your digital repository in terms of technical, structural and organizational quality, compared to other libraries of a similar size? * Position of respondent
|
Head of library/ Chief librarian |
Head of department |
Project manager |
Employee |
Total |
Better (1) |
31.3% |
29.2% |
54.5% |
41.7% |
34.7% |
15 |
7 |
6 |
5 |
33 |
Comparable to others (2) |
62.5% |
45.8% |
45.5% |
50.0% |
54.7% |
30 |
11 |
5 |
6 |
52 |
Worse (3) |
6.3% |
25.0% |
.0% |
8.3% |
10.5% |
3 |
6 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
Total (Mean) |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
N=48 |
N=24 |
N=11 |
N=12 |
N=95 |
(1.75) |
(1.96) |
(1.45) |
(1.67) |
(1.76) |
Kruskal Wallis Test
|
Test Statistics |
Chi-Square |
4.625 |
df |
3 |
Asymp. Sig. |
.201 |
Q8 - How would you assess your digital repository in terms of technical, structural and organizational quality, compared to other libraries of a similar size? * Background of respondent
|
Librarian |
Technician / IT |
Manager |
Scientist |
Total |
Better (1) |
41.7% |
30.8% |
16.0% |
55.6% |
34.7% |
20 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
33 |
Comparable to others (2) |
50.0% |
46.2% |
76.0% |
33.3% |
54.7% |
24 |
6 |
19 |
3 |
52 |
Worse (3) |
8.3% |
23.1% |
8.0% |
11.1% |
10.5% |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
10 |
Total (Mean) |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
N=48 |
N=13 |
N=25 |
N=9 |
N=95 |
(1.67) |
(1.92) |
(1.92) |
(1.56) |
(1.76) |
Kruskal Wallis Test
|
Test Statistics |
Chi-Square |
4.978 |
df |
3 |
Asymp. Sig. |
.173 |
Q8 - How would you assess your digital repository in terms of technical, structural and organizational quality, compared to other libraries of a similar size? * Age of respondent
|
Under 31 |
31-40 years |
41-50 years |
51-60 years |
Over 60 |
Total |
Better (1) |
66.7% |
31.3% |
29.6% |
31.6% |
37.5% |
32.6% |
2 |
5 |
8 |
12 |
3 |
30 |
Comparable to others (2) |
33.3% |
62.5% |
51.9% |
60.5% |
50.0% |
56.5% |
1 |
10 |
14 |
23 |
4 |
52 |
Worse (3) |
.0% |
6.3% |
18.5% |
7.9% |
12.5% |
10.9% |
0 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
10 |
Total (Mean) |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
N=3 |
N=16 |
N=27 |
N=38 |
N=8 |
N=92 |
(1.33) |
(1.75) |
(1.89) |
(1.76) |
(1.75) |
(1.78) |
Kruskal Wallis Test
|
Test Statistics |
Chi-Square |
2.308 |
df |
4 |
Asymp. Sig. |
.679 |
Q8 - How would you assess your digital repository in terms of technical, structural and organizational quality, compared to other libraries of a similar size? * Q5 - Does your library have any written guidelines for the long-term preservation of digital documents?
|
Yes. These guidelines are published online. |
Yes, but these guidelines are not publicly accessible. |
No, but there are plans to create some. |
No, and there are no plans to create any. |
Total |
Better (1) |
55.6% |
41.7% |
25.9% |
36.4% |
34.7% |
10 |
5 |
14 |
4 |
33 |
Comparable to others (2) |
44.4% |
58.3% |
59.3% |
45.5% |
54.7% |
8 |
7 |
32 |
5 |
52 |
Worse (3) |
.0% |
.0% |
14.8% |
18.2% |
10.5% |
0 |
0 |
8 |
2 |
10 |
Total (Mean) |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
N=18 |
N=12 |
N=54 |
N=11 |
N=95 |
(1.44) |
(1.58) |
(1.89) |
(1.82) |
(1.76) |
Kruskal Wallis Test
|
Test Statistics |
Chi-Square |
7.507 |
df |
3 |
Asymp. Sig. |
.057 |
Q8 - How would you assess your digital repository in terms of technical, structural and organizational quality, compared to other libraries of a similar size? * Q5.1 - Does your library have any written guidelines for the collection of digital documents?
|
Yes. These guidelines are published online. |
Yes, but these guidelines are not publicly accessible. |
No, but there are plans to create some. |
No, and there are no plans to create any. |
Total |
Better (1) |
77.8% |
40.0% |
33.3% |
.0% |
50.0% |
7 |
6 |
2 |
0 |
15 |
Comparable to others (2) |
22.2% |
60.0% |
66.7% |
.0% |
50.0% |
2 |
9 |
4 |
0 |
15 |
Worse (3) |
.0% |
.0% |
.0% |
.0% |
.0% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Total (Mean) |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
.0% |
100.0% |
N=9 |
N=15 |
N=6 |
N=0 |
N=30 |
(1.22) |
(1.60) |
(1.67) |
. |
(1.50) |
Kruskal Wallis Test
|
Test Statistics |
Chi-Square |
3.910 |
df |
2 |
Asymp. Sig. |
.142 |
Q8 - How would you assess your digital repository in terms of technical, structural and organizational quality, compared to other libraries of a similar size? * Q6 - Which software solution do you use (or intend to use) for your digital repository?
|
Open source software |
Commercial software |
Specifically developed software |
Mixed software |
Not yet decided |
Total |
Better (1) |
26.8% |
50.0% |
50.0% |
50.0% |
9.1% |
34.4% |
11 |
6 |
8 |
5 |
1 |
31 |
Comparable to others (2) |
63.4% |
41.7% |
43.8% |
40.0% |
72.7% |
55.6% |
26 |
5 |
7 |
4 |
8 |
50 |
Worse (3) |
9.8% |
8.3% |
6.3% |
10.0% |
18.2% |
10.0% |
4 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
Total (Mean) |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
N=41 |
N=12 |
N=16 |
N=10 |
N=11 |
N=90 |
(1.83) |
(1.58) |
(1.56) |
(1.60) |
(2.09) |
(1.76) |
Kruskal Wallis Test
|
Test Statistics |
Chi-Square |
7.392 |
df |
4 |
Asymp. Sig. |
.117 |
Q8 - How would you assess your digital repository in terms of technical, structural and organizational quality, compared to other libraries of a similar size? * Q7 - Which kinds of digital documents do you already archive at your library?
|
Ready-to-print master files |
Offline documents |
Online documents |
Websites |
Other types of digital documents |
Better (1) |
38.9% |
37.8% |
35.8% |
45.5% |
36.4% |
21 |
14 |
19 |
10 |
12 |
Comparable to others (2) |
51.9% |
43.2% |
54.7% |
50.0% |
54.5% |
28 |
16 |
29 |
11 |
18 |
Worse (3) |
9.3% |
18.9% |
9.4% |
4.5% |
9.1% |
5 |
7 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
Total (Mean) |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
N=54 |
N=37 |
N=53 |
N=22 |
N=33 |
(1.70) |
(1.81) |
(1.74) |
(1.59) |
(1.73) |
Mann-Whitney U Test: Ready-to-print master files
|
Test Statistics |
Mann-Whitney U |
990.500 |
Wilcoxon W |
2475.500 |
Z |
-.983 |
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) |
.326 |
Mann-Whitney U Test: Offline documents
|
Test Statistics |
Mann-Whitney U |
1025.500 |
Wilcoxon W |
2736.500 |
Z |
-.407 |
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) |
.684 |
Mann-Whitney U Test: Online documents
|
Test Statistics |
Mann-Whitney U |
1070.000 |
Wilcoxon W |
2501.000 |
Z |
-.362 |
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) |
.717 |
Mann-Whitney U Test: Websites
|
Test Statistics |
Mann-Whitney U |
662.000 |
Wilcoxon W |
915.000 |
Z |
-1.397 |
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) |
.162 |
Mann-Whitney U Test: Other types of digital documents
|
Test Statistics |
Mann-Whitney U |
985.500 |
Wilcoxon W |
1546.500 |
Z |
-.329 |
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) |
.742 |
Q8 - How would you assess your digital repository in terms of technical, structural and organizational quality, compared to other libraries of a similar size? * Q9 - Which department(s) is (are) responsible for the long-term preservation of digital documents within the organizational structure of your library?
|
A new department |
An existing department |
Several departments |
Total |
Better (1) |
43.8% |
34.2% |
31.7% |
34.7% |
7 |
13 |
13 |
33 |
Comparable to others (2) |
50.0% |
52.6% |
58.5% |
54.7% |
8 |
20 |
24 |
52 |
Worse (3) |
6.3% |
13.2% |
9.8% |
10.5% |
1 |
5 |
4 |
10 |
Total (Mean) |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
N=16 |
N=38 |
N=41 |
N=95 |
(1.62) |
(1.79) |
(1.78) |
(1.76) |
Kruskal Wallis Test
|
Test Statistics |
Chi-Square |
.849 |
df |
2 |
Asymp. Sig. |
.654 |
Q8 - How would you assess your digital repository in terms of technical, structural and organizational quality, compared to other libraries of a similar size? * Q10 - How is the long-term preservation of digital documents financed at your library?
|
Exclusively from the library's own budget |
Mainly from the library's own budget |
Mainly from third-party funds |
Exclusively from third-party funds |
Ratios are approximately equal |
Total |
Better (1) |
23.5% |
51.6% |
25.0% |
100.0% |
30.8% |
35.2% |
8 |
16 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
32 |
Comparable to others (2) |
61.8% |
41.9% |
58.3% |
.0% |
61.5% |
53.8% |
21 |
13 |
7 |
0 |
8 |
49 |
Worse (3) |
14.7% |
6.5% |
16.7% |
.0% |
7.7% |
11.0% |
5 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
Total (Mean) |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
N=34 |
N=31 |
N=12 |
N=1 |
N=13 |
N=91 |
(1.91) |
(1.55) |
(1.92) |
(1.00) |
(1.77) |
(1.76) |
Kruskal Wallis Test
|
Test Statistics |
Chi-Square |
7.914 |
df |
4 |
Asymp. Sig. |
.095 |